← All use cases 01 · ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE · PROPOSED WORKFLOW

One product change. Connected content kept in sync.

Keep documentation, diagrams, screenshots and tutorial references aligned with approved product changes.

Who this is for: Product teams, SaaS companies, technical writers and support teams. Illustrative concept, not a deployed OSYNIA capability.

01 · START WITH THE PROBLEM

What problem are we trying to solve?

A company changes its sign-in flow. The same old instructions appear in help articles, diagrams, screenshots and videos across several websites.

A company changes its sign-in flow. The same old instructions appear in help articles, diagrams, screenshots and videos across several websites.

Relevant contracts: OSYNIA-R resource manifest and OSYNIA-S dependency / change proposal.

EXAMPLE USER REQUEST
“We have introduced passkeys in release 4.2. Show everything that could be outdated and prepare updates for review.”
BEFORE · COMMON APPROACH
  1. An engineer announces the new sign-in flow in a release ticket.
  2. Writers search the documentation and separate media systems manually.
  3. Some screenshots and video segments are overlooked; older versions remain accessible.
  4. Support agents and AI answers may quote conflicting instructions.
WITH OSYNIA · PROPOSED
  1. A versioned product fact describes the approved change.
  2. The system identifies related pages, diagrams and video timestamps using explicit links.
  3. Proposed edits and non-editable video segments are presented to content owners.
  4. Only approved updates are published; remaining exceptions stay visible.
02 · STEP-BY-STEP USER JOURNEY

From request to a verifiable outcome.

Switch between General and Technical in the header to explore the same journey at two levels.

01

Record the approved change

The product owner publishes what changed, when it becomes effective and who approved it.

Create a versioned semantic resource for authentication capability 4.2 with provenance and effective date.

Illustrative output

Approved source: Sign-in supports passkeys from version 4.2

02

Find every reference

The system checks known links to help articles, diagrams, screenshots and tutorial sections.

Traverse typed inbound dependencies and pinned references; collect impacted resource IDs and media timecodes.

Illustrative output

Example: 8 help pages, 3 diagrams, 5 screenshots, 2 video sections

03

Prepare safe changes

Writers receive suggested text and diagram edits. Existing video footage is flagged for review, not silently altered.

Generate version-conditional change proposals; validate current ETags and flag immutable or historically bound media.

Illustrative output

13 proposed edits; 2 video sections need human review

04

Approve and publish

Owners examine proposed updates and approve only accurate changes.

Apply role-based approval, optimistic concurrency, release gating and versioned publication.

Illustrative output

Approved changes published to participating channels

05

Confirm what is current

A clear report shows what changed, what remains pending and which version can be trusted.

Record publication receipts, invalidations, audit trail and canonical citation version.

Illustrative output

Example status: 13 updated, 2 flagged, 0 silently overwritten

03 · RESPONSE & OUTCOME

What would the person see?

ILLUSTRATIVE SYSTEM RESPONSE

“I found connected references to the updated sign-in process. Review 13 suggested updates and 2 recorded tutorial sections before publishing.”

ILLUSTRATIVE COMPLETION

Example completion: approved documentation and diagrams updated. Two video sections remain flagged for manual revision.

A proposed success message must be backed by actual execution and verification in a real implementation.

04 · UNDER THE HOOD

How the proposed technology fits together.

This example depends on information that explains what it is, trusted links to other information, and clearly described operations when an action is needed.

What must be in place:

  • Links between the product fact and dependent resources must exist.
  • Content owners must approve consequential changes.
  • Every destination must support controlled publication or be tracked as an exception.
Resources
Versioned product fact, document, screenshot, diagram and timestamped video segments
Contracts
OSYNIA-R resource manifest and OSYNIA-S dependency / change proposal

Proposed system sequence

  1. Change publication
  2. Dependency traversal
  3. Impact proposal
  4. Owner review
  5. Version-aware publish
  6. Audit and status

Security and governance controls

  • Publisher authority
  • Optimistic version check
  • Reviewer approval
  • Immutable historical media

Illustrative JSON contract

{
  "resourceId": "feature:passkeys",
  "version": "4.2",
  "change": {
    "property": "supportedSignIn",
    "value": "passkeys"
  },
  "dependencies": [
    {
      "type": "documentedBy",
      "id": "doc:signin"
    },
    {
      "type": "explainedAt",
      "id": "video:training#t=08:30"
    }
  ],
  "reviewRequired": true
}
RELEVANT OSYNIA SPECIFICATIONS
Resources & MeaningSynchronisation & ChangeTrust & Governance
Explore proposed specifications →
05 · REAL-WORLD VALIDATION

How would we know it works?

These are proposed measures, not published results.

Update completeness

Known affected references correctly identified / total labelled affected references

Time to consistency

Elapsed time from approved source change to all applicable reference updates

Human review burden

Reviewer minutes and false-positive proposals per release

Requirements for adoption

  • Links between the product fact and dependent resources must exist.
  • Content owners must approve consequential changes.
  • Every destination must support controlled publication or be tracked as an exception.

Limits and trade-offs

  • Unlinked documents may still require conventional search or review.
  • A recorded tutorial cannot be retroactively corrected by changing its metadata.
  • Changes to approved history require explicit version and governance rules.

This page presents research hypotheses, not verified performance improvements, customer results or a live demonstration.